Category Archives: Physics

The Trouble with Time Travel

by ,

I love a good time travel story. They make for some of the best movies and TV in the sci-fi genre. It seems a real shame to pour a bucket of cold water on the idea that time travel is possible (beyond the extent to which time travel is already impossible for us, that is).

One might argue, quite reasonably, that humankind has never invented time travel at any point in the future. Because if we had at any point invented time travel, we would likely have completely destroyed our history in short order (name one thing that has the potential to make serious money or effect significant political change that hasn’t been corrupted by people shortly after its introduction into reality).

But the real trouble with time travel may have less to do with the fact that it is not possible to achieve, and more to do with the possibility that it wouldn’t work the way we think it would anyway.

Let’s take a moment to think about our expectations of time travel, at least how we use it in our sci-fi stories:

The I reappear where I left time travel:

Or the Back to the Future model of time travel. This suggests that we move through time and reappear in the exact “fourth dimensional location” that we left in our launching point; Marty leaves the Twin Pines Mall parking lot in 1985 and arrives at the precise spot in 1955 on the Peabody farm upon which the mall’s parking lot will later be built. Or even less likely that Marty can reappear on the very same train tracks that he leaves in 1885. (Never mind that Southern California is on a series of fault lines and the exact position of the train tracks was likely to have moved some in the one hundred years between 1885 and 1985 – at least a few inches – certainly enough dislocation of the tracks to derail a train.)

The I reappear anywhere I wish time travel:

It is far more common for sci-fi stories to allow our time traveling heroes (or villains) to be able to pick a place on the planet to reappear in the destination time-line. This is an obvious advantage to the writer as this will certainly enable more robust story-lines for the adventure. Let’s go to 18th century Vienna, for example, is far more interesting for most stories than let’s go to what was once the backyard of my house two hundred years ago (which is the spot in my workshop where I built my time machine). (Never mind that in this scenario, if one were to re-materialize to the other side of the planet, they would likely re-materialize oriented in the same direction as the location on the globe from which they came – or that they usually re-materialize at relative ground-level.)

These two “types” of time travel make up the bulk of the expectations of how time traveling would work, at least as considered by our sci-fi stories about it. The problem is, even if time travel is actually possible, it is not likely to work as it is presented in either of these two scenarios.

Albert Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity postulates that spacetime is a single thing, not two different things. This makes for the basis of this hypothesis that I am making here that we are not likely to be able to move through time without also having to move through the equal amount of space.

First consider that the Earth is revolving at roughly 1,000 miles per hour at the equator. This rotation is how we experience a day here on the surface of the Earth with differential of daytime and nighttime, and with the sun and stars moving across the sky at a consistent clip from our surface perspective.

But that’s just scratching the surface. In addition to revolving at 1,000 miles per hour at the equator, the Earth is also orbiting the Sun at approximately 67,108 miles per hour, which is how we get our year (and Earth’s axis tilt provides us with our four distinct seasons as we complete each revolution).

In addition to these movements through space, the Sun, along with our entire solar system, is orbiting the center of the Milky Way Galaxy at approximately 447,387 miles per hour.

Also consider that the Milky Way is moving through the universe towards an eventual collision with the Andromeda Galaxy at approximately 252,000 miles per hour. This is not likely to be the entire measurement of the speed at which the Milky Way is actually moving through the universe – it may well be moving faster (or slower), but that is a difficult measurement to pinpoint since all of the objects against which we may be able to measure that speed are so far away and also moving at great speed themselves. There is no known stationary object in the universe against which we can accurately measure our speed of travel through the universe itself, so far we can really only measure with any degree of certainty our galaxy’s speed of travel relative to other objects.

So if space and time are intrinsically linked together as the same thing, as stated in Special Relativity, and we were to travel back in time one hour, wouldn’t we actually re-materialize at the same location in spacetime where that exact launching point on Earth was located in the universe one hour earlier?

With all of these traveling speeds to consider, if we were to travel back in spacetime one hour, we could literally re-materialize hundreds of thousands of miles away from our launching point to a spot in deep space. The very spot where our launching point on Earth appeared in spacetime one hour beforehand.

That then, in a nutshell, could be the trouble with time travel. We can’t travel through space without traveling through time, and likewise, we cannot travel through time without traveling through space.

The (Imaginary) Physics & Root Technologies of the Star Wars Universe

by ,
Pre-Ramble

There are already books available here on Earth offering to explain the physics of the Star Trek universe. But for Star Wars, most books focus instead on how Star Wars “got physics wrong” rather then to try to create an imaginary framework within which the technology of the series could be explained. This blog post is an attempt to offer an explanation of the physics of the Star Wars universe in a way that does not interact with the actual story lines by explaining the physics of how gadgets in the story work, rather than why they might be in the story.

Imaginary physics and actual physics can have a bit of overlap. For example: warp drive may actually be possible, but there is no such thing as dilithium crystals (but there are lithium-6 crystals that may someday actually help us get to Mars in half the time of conventional propulsion systems).

All copyrights and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

Overview

The history books in the Star Wars universe may record that the scientific manipulation of neutrinos was discovered shortly after the invention of the laser (about equivalent to our post-war technology of the early 1960’s). Manipulating neutrinos is something that in our universe is still quite impossible, and considered unlikely for the foreseeable future. With this discovery their technological development history arc looks very different from ours.

The primary thing that sets Star Wars universe physics apart from the real world of human physics, as well as other make believe physics universes in myriad science fiction story lines, is that Star Wars physics is based on the mastery and manipulation of neutrinos. Many tech inventions of the Star Wars universe would rely on how neutrinos can be made to interact with matter on a quantum physics level, and in how neutrinos can be ‘displaced’ through various forms of scientific manipulation. This open up the possibility of creating new and innovative ways of explaining virtually all Star Wars root technologies and devices.

This proposed make-believe technology is well suited to be very reliably measured and controlled using analog feedback resonance controls, which use dependable solid-state analog components. This might explain why an interplanetary civilization, that appears to have been very technologically advanced for a prolonged period of time, does not seem to have experienced the same digital technological revolution that we have been undertaking in our technological development arc. This could explain why they continue to rely on knobs and gauges and seem to lack virtually any computerized systems or controls.

Lightsabers

Enabling Technologies:

1 – 4d Blaster technology (see Blasters)

2 – Neutrino Resonance Controller

3 – Neutrino Virtual Prism Controller (see Death Star blaster beam combination)

The Neutrino Resonance Controller is a component device that creates a neutrino resonance bubble in the local population of neutrinos. This bubble is matched to the specific sub-atomic resonance frequency of the 4d Blaster beam coming from that same lightsaber device. Each lightsaber device creates a unique and random frequency code so that the two beams will repel each other and act as a sword, rather than just pass through each other like two beams of light. The bubble surrounds the Neutrino Resonance Controller in an extreme oblong shape. The neutrino resonance bubble has the scientific property of completely dissipating the 4d Blaster beam that has its same unique frequency, while at the same time passing through all matter without any interaction like a typical neutrino would.

In Ep7 we see Neutrino Virtual Prism Controller technology being used to split the 4d Blaster beam into three beams, resulting in the three-pronged lightsaber (see diagram below).

lightsaber-basic-design
Blasters

Enabling Technology:

4d Blaster Laser

Manipulates neutrinos on a quantum physics level to create a feedback loop which amplifies the amount of energy contained in a laser beam. The amplification increases power by one order of magnitude for each energy unit. Only the amount of energy used to create the beam limits how powerful the beam can become. This amplification technology is subject to loss of power to the beam over distance in a predicable equation, which makes it necessary to be in relatively close proximity to the target for the weapon to be effective.

Death Star blaster beam combination (as first seen in the destruction of Alderaan in Ep4)

Enabling Technology:

Neutrino Virtual Prism Controller

Creates virtual neutrino prisms that can be used to change the direction of light energy at a specific point in space relative to the controller device. These virtual prisms can combine multiple 4d Blaster Beams into a single beam, which becomes increasingly magnified in power relative to the number of source beams that are being combined.

It was later discovered that this technology could be adapted to split a low-energy 4d Blaster Beam into multiple beams, each with minimal power loss from the original beam. This discovery directly lead to the invention of the Three-Pronged Lightsaber (as first seen in Ep7).

Defense/Deflector Shields

Enabling Technology:

Neutrino Displacement Accelerators (pictured below)

Uses spinning turbines to “throw out” a scattering of neutrino particles in a controlled pattern. These neutrino particles have also been modified and energized in such a way that makes them absorb and repel forms of energy.

Power Converters

Enabling Technologies:

1 – Discovery of Neutrino-Conjunctive Particles

2 – Neutrino-Conjunction Capacitor

Neutrino-Conjunctive Particles were quickly adapted to work inside of “neutrino-powered” batteries. These are usually replaceable, interchangeable component parts that act to create power from neutrino particles by forcing them to interact with protons on a quantum physics level. This interaction creates free electrons, which are then harnessed by the Neutrino-Conjunction Capacitor to provide a steady, scalable and adjustable power source for myriad devices.

Hyper Drive

Enabling Technology:

Matter-Neutrino Cohesion Controller

Manipulates the sub-atomic oscillation of neutrinos to force them to interact with and form a temporary and controllable cohesion with matter. This allows each molecule of a star ship and its contents to be linked to a neutrino particle on a quantum mechanical level. The neutrino and the particle of matter, by the property of their attachment to each other, can then both be made to travel at faster than light speeds.

Carbon Freeze Chamber(Ep2)

Enabling Technologies:

1 – Matter-Neutrino Cohesion Controller (see hyper drive)

2 – Discovery of Neutrino-Conjunctive Particles (see power converters)

Encases matter in carbonite. This is achieved by creating an interaction between the molecules of matter to be frozen and the neutrinos in the area, which makes a new molecular pairing in the same way as used by a Hyper Drive. A Neutrino-Conjunctive carbon molecule is then infused with each pairing which locks them together as a new carbonite molecule. The molecular pairing can be removed with a specific frequency signal which causes the carbonite structure to spontaneously evaporate thereby releasing the frozen matter.

Cloud City

Enabling Technology:

Neutrino-Gravitational Anchor Controller

The Unipod at the bottom of the stalk below Cloud City is the location of the Neutrino-Gravitational Anchor Controller. This device creates an anchor in space that is tied to the local gravitational forces in the area. The result is an anchor that will not move from its location relative to the gravitational source, such as a planet. This anchor effect occurs irrespective if its position is within the atmosphere, as it is with Cloud City, as apposed to a space-station in orbit above the atmosphere. Cloud City has been held up by, and built upon, this Neutrino-Gravitational Anchor in the atmosphere of the gas giant planet, Bespin.

Holograms

Enabling Technology:

Neutrino Scanning Emitter

Neutrinos are positioned at a point in space relative to the Neutrino Scanning Emitter device, which is similar in technological complexity to cathode ray tube technology. These positioned neutrinos are at a variable intensity which affects the amount of light reflected off of them. This effect results in a moving 3-D image in visible light.

Whatfore art thou, Dark Energy?

by ,

Pre-Ramble:

It was the fall of 2005, and it was not the first time in my adult life that I had risked too much and lost everything and had to move back in with my parents. This gave me plenty of time to sit and think deeply about things. The usual things came to mind at first, as one might imagine in such a scenario, but then one day I decided I needed something new to occupy my mind.

I am not a scientist. I did not study astronomy or physics at a college level. But, like many people, I do thoroughly enjoy reading about the new discoveries that keep getting made in these fields at ever increasing frequency. I do not profess to have any answers, only some specific questions that I WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THE CONVERSATION.

Since Dark Energy and Dark Matter were such new concepts back in 2005, many great minds had all kinds of ideas – and no ideas – about what they may be. In that respect not much has really changed in the last ten-plus years. Many had then, and still now, wonder how much of our knowledge of the universe will need to be completely rewritten to integrate these two new phenomenon into our paradigm of the universe.

The episode of thought from my parents livingroom that has led to this blog post so many years later started like any other thought experiment. But in my case, my thought was that we should consider Occam’s razor in our attempt to explain these two new forces.

Consider these two scenarios:

First, we have lived in and studied this universe from our particular vantage point and discovered many, many things over the centuries. But, somehow, two previously completely unknown forces have revealed themselves to not only make up most of the universe, but together they make up ninety-some percent of the universe. And we never had any inkling that they were there. None. They were a complete surprise, and now we have to rewrite everything that we think we know to include them in our understanding as a whole.

Or, second. These two new forces, perhaps, just maybe, are things that we have already discovered. They are just playing out at a level that we are not familiar with and couldn’t have foreseen possible from our vantage point on a tiny rock floating in the middle of it all.

So this was the start of my thought experiment for Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Could they be explained, at least in part, by previously unimagined actions of forces that we do already know about, but happening at a level that we previously did not understand possible? This blog post will focus on the shot-in-the-dark hypothesis that I framed to explain what makes up Dark Energy (Dark Matter post to follow later).

So, what is Dark Energy? (Well, we don’t know.)

In the olden times of astronomy up until the early twentieth century it was commonly accepted and believed that the universe was made up only of the Milky Way (galaxy) and that it was a constant, stable, and relatively unchanging place. Then in the 1920’s Edwin Hubble was able to show that the universe not only contained other galaxies that were separate from the Milky Way, but that these other galaxies were – for the most part – also moving away from the Milky Way. In short, it was discovered that the universe was larger than previously thought and it was also still expanding and getting even larger.

This discovery gave us the theory of the Big Bang. Since we could now see and measure that virtually every galaxy in the universe was indeed moving away from us, if we were to rewind time and go backwards, the galaxies would be getting closer to us. If this rewound back as far as it could go it would suggest that all of the galaxies were once together in the same place as each other. The energy from the Big Bang created the force that made these galaxies move away from each other.

For the near-entire remainder of the twentieth century most scientists believed that this expansion of the universe must be slowing down, that the effect of gravity must be acting against the expansion. Much later, in 1998, some scientists, working to try to measure how much the expansion was slowing down, discovered something completely unexpected: The expansion was not slowing down at all. Even more puzzling it was actually continuing to accelerate.

The search to explain what force could possibly be making the expansion of the universe continue to accelerate is the search to understand Dark Energy. Dark Energy is widely considered to work against the force of gravity and repel matter. And it is this repellent force that we now call Dark Energy. We call it “Dark” Energy not because of an absence of light, but because it is so unexpected and mysterious we can’t put a finger on what it could be – it seems to go against everything we thought we understood.

Hypothesis: Could Dark Energy be some sort of “Reverse” Gravitational Time Dilation Effect?

Science has documented that space-time dilates. General Relativity says that the closer you are to a heavy mass, such as Earth, the slower time will move for you. To go to an extreme on this point, theoretical physicists believe that the closer one gets to a black hole’s event horizon the slower time would move for you until it seems to come to a virtual stand-still.

We have already directly measured this phenomenon with the clocks on-board a satellite in orbit above Earth running slightly faster than an identical clock on the surface of Earth.

More extreme (not considering for the counter-effects of Special Relativity) the clock on the Voyager 1 spacecraft, which has been steadily moving away form the Earth since 1977, should now be about 10 seconds or so ahead of us here on Earth. But it’s not just that Voyager 1’s clock is now running 10 seconds fast; Voyager 1 has actually experienced 10 more seconds of existence in the universe than we have experienced back here on Earth since its launch on September 5, 1977.

This happens because our Sun has created a gravity well in the fabric of space-time, like any other heavy mass object in the universe. The gravity well that the Sun has created is in relation to its total mass. Other heavy mass objects also make gravity wells relative to their total mass. This means that the gravity well made by Earth is much smaller than the Sun’s, but the gravity well created by a super-massive black hole (like the one at the center of the Milky Way) is much, much larger than the Sun’s.

gravity well

Interstellar space within the Milky Way, the space in-between stars like our Sun, would have extremely negligible gravitational pull form our Sun or other stars, and someday Voyager 1 will pass out into this part of space-time. Many may believe that then the rate of space-time would arrive at “zero”. But would it? Still have some effect of the Milky Way galaxy and it’s gravity.

assumed time dilation scale

Kuiper belt is a disk of smallish objects that were leftovers from the formation of our Solar system 4.5 billion years ago. These are objects from the size of the dwarf planet Pluto all the way down to tiny pebbles of debris. This belt extends out from the edge of our Solar system, and it is in the Kuiper belt where the Voyager spacecraft is currently traveling.

So let’s consider this: A tiny Kuiper Belt object the size of a golf ball that has been floating around the edge of our solar system since its formation is not the same age as the Earth. If in the last 39 years Voyager 1 has managed to become 10 seconds or so older than us, then this tiny golf ball that has been in less gravity than the Earth for the last 4.5 billion years is now something in the neighborhood of 40.7 years older than the Earth. Meaning that that little golf ball has experienced around 40 more years of existence in the universe than the Earth has experienced.

This extra time that our golf ball sized Kuiper belt object and the Voyager spacecraft have experienced didn’t just happen all at once. They have been experiencing more time going by all along. Its hard to understand, I know. But when an hour goes by for us here on the surface of Earth, a little bit more than an hour has gone by in the Kuiper belt area of our solar system. It’s only a tiny, tiny bit longer than an hour, to ballpark it for every single 1.000 hour even that goes by on Earth 1.00000000995911331298 hours goes by in our golf ball object’s neighborhood. The difference is too small to be perceived by humans but it does add up or time, for every 3.18 years that goes by here on Earth objects in the golf ball object’s neighborhood experience one extra second. But again, that one extra second doesn’t just get added on every 3.18 years. It happens continuously all the time, it’s happening right now, it happened yesterday and it will happen again tomorrow.

So if we know that space-time moves at different speeds in relation to gravitational mass. And we believe that space-time can, in fact, dilate to a near stand-still in the presence of super-massive objects. Then why could the opposite dilation effect not be possible in the “super-absence” of gravity? Why would we assume that Voyager is now moving at “zero” on the dilation scale? Perhaps there is more to the dilation scale than we have previously thought possible?

Intergalactic space-time, the space in-between galaxies, would be the equivalent of leaving the outer edges of the Milky Way where there would be a negligible gravitational pull from the Milky Way or other galaxies. Outside of any galaxy there should be less gravitational effects from the gravity wells created by galaxies.

possible time dilation scale

If this were to be true, it would mean that more time goes by in interstellar space than goes by on Earth during the same period. Meaning when we experience one hour here on Earth, more than one hour goes by in areas of space-time where there is less and less gravity. If Voyager is experiencing 0.00000000995911331298 more time every hour than it could be that with even less gravity in intergalactic space the effect is even greater.

So here is the Dark Energy connection. If the universe has always been expanding at the same rate of speed from the beginning, as was assumed for much of the twentieth century, but in areas between galaxies more time is going by relative to inside the galaxies, then the result would look like an acceleration to an observer inside the gravity well of one of these galaxies.

Let’s use an example that most people would understand. Let’s take the distance that an automobile going 60-miles-per-hour would travel in one hour of time (as it’s measured on Earth). On Earth the math is easy, it would go exactly one mile. But in a part of space-time were time goes longer than on Earth, that automobile would travel for longer than one Earth-hour. Even though it is still going the same 60-miles-per-hour it would travel that speed for more time.

If less and less gravity makes space-time dilate more and more, than this effect would start to have a compounding effect. If we had one hour of universe expansion here on Earth, and, let’s say, one hour and one minute of expansion at a point in intergalactic space then there is actually more space created from the expansion in the intergalactic area. And this extra one minute of space created is also expanding at the same rate. Over billions of years this would add up to very vast areas of space that are being created in intergalactic space just due to the extra small amount of extra time that passes in that area. And again, all of the extra area of space created is also expanding at the same rate.

Could this effect possibly be what we are now trying to describe as Dark Energy? To tell you the truth, I have no idea. But it sure is fun to think about.